data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d9ca/1d9ca6b6722a8ee32ef11681a86e7dbe99ebf0c7" alt=""
In this deed, it is said that, first, John Conard himself shall be held accountable for the payment of rent, then his brother Jonathan, and thirdly, Joseph, the son of his brother James.
But, James was John's uncle, not his brother.
This was likely deliberate. Lord Fairfax (shown in image) was canny and untrusting. In each land rental, three close relatives were made responsible, one of the three preferably a young boy. This would account for the choosing of young Joseph, instead of his father. And referring to his uncle James as John's brother made the relationship appear closer.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I welcome your comments and questions. If you do not have a public profile on Blogger, please leave contact information if you would like a response.